Mahalo for supporting the Honolulu Star-Advertiser. Take pleasure in this free story!
It is time to flip round.
The Hawaii Guests and Convention Bureau filed a protest Tuesday, alleging that the Hawaii Tourism Authority violated authorities procurement when it awarded its largest enterprise, a U.S. model administration and international assist companies contract, with the Hawaii Native Improvement Board.
The bureau, which has all the time had a job within the US and has a present contract, was initially chosen by HTA in a slender win over CNHA to retain these duties in December in a multi-year, $100 million deal. However after the CNHA protested the choice, Mike McCartney, director of the Division of Enterprise, Financial Improvement and Tourism, terminated the contract with HVCB, which was price $22.5 million in its first 12 months.
McCartney filed a brand new petition and the CNHA gained. Now it is HVCB’s flip to protest.
HVCB President and CEO John Monahan didn’t reply to a Honolulu Star-Advertiser request for remark. Nonetheless, on Tuesday, Monahan despatched a message to HVCB members saying: “I wish to let you recognize that HVCB at the moment filed a proper protest in opposition to the HTA’s choice to award a U.S. trip contract beneath re-solicited RFP #22-01 to the Hawaii Native Improvement Council (CNHA). Our objection is permitted beneath each the RFP HTA specs and HRS § 103D and HAR § 3-126-4.
“Whereas I’m unable to make any additional feedback at the moment, I want to thanks on your continued assist as we work by this course of,” he stated. “I am going to let you recognize as quickly as I can.”
McCartney stated he had acquired the protest and “will conduct a complete assessment of its content material.” “My function as (head of the buying company) is to completely examine the character of the grievance and decide whether or not the choice is truthful and within the normal curiosity of the state,” he stated.
“I have to stay neutral and goal on this subsequent step of the method and due to this fact should intentionally and respectfully chorus from making any public remark. After the method is accomplished and the contract is concluded and/or the protest is resolved, I can remark and reply any questions.”
Sources accustomed to HVCB stated the corporate seemingly had doubts that the adjustments made by HTA throughout the second request for a contract to the RFP parameters and procurement course of had been truthful.
They stated that HVCB may query HTA’s choice to regulate the pricing mannequin so that there’s much less concentrate on advertising throughout the second buy. Sources indicated that HTA considerably modified the composition of the analysis panel in April when it re-requested the contract. They stated the HVCB may additionally problem the general {qualifications} of the second choice committee and the CNHA group.
The second request for proposals committee, which didn’t embrace resort homeowners, selected CNHA over HVCB…
.
